Skip to content โ†’

the moonshine picture โ€“ at last

The monstrous moonshine picture is the subgraph of Conwayโ€™s big picture consisting of all lattices needed to describe the 171 moonshine groups.

It consists of:

โ€“ exactly 218 vertices (that is, lattices), out of which

โ€“ 97 are number-lattices (that is of the form M with M a positive integer), and

โ€“ 121 are proper number-like lattices (that is of the form Mgh with M a positive integer, h a divisor of 24 and 1โ‰คgโ‰คh with (g,h)=1).

The 97 number lattices are closed under taking divisors, and the corresponding Hasse diagram has the following shape

Here, number-lattices have the same colour if they have the same local structure in the moonshine picture (that is, have a similar neighbourhood of proper number-like lattices).

There are 7 different types of local behaviour:

The white numbered lattices have no proper number-like neighbours in the picture.

The yellow number lattices (2,10,14,18,22,26,32,34,40,68,80,88,90,112,126,144,180,208 = 2M) have local structure

Misplaced &

which involves all 2-nd (square) roots of unity centered at the lattice.

The green number lattices (3,15,21,39,57,93,96,120 = 3M) have local structure

Misplaced &

which involve all 3-rd roots of unity centered at the lattice.

The blue number lattices (4,16,20,28,36,44,52,56,72,104 = 4M) have as local structure

Misplaced &

and involve the 2-nd and 4-th root of unity centered at the lattice.

The purple number lattices (6,30,42,48,60 = 6M) have local structure

Misplaced &

and involve all 2-nd, 3-rd and 6-th roots of unity centered at the lattice.

The unique brown number lattice 8 has local structure

Misplaced &

which involves all 2-nd, 4-th and 8-th roots of unity centered at 8.

Finally, the local structure for the central red lattices 12,24=12M is

Misplaced &

It involves all 2-nd, 3-rd, 4-th, 6-th and 12-th roots of unity with center 12M.

No doubt this will be relevant in connecting moonshine with non-commutative geometry and issues of replicability as in Plazasโ€™ paper Noncommutative Geometry of Groups like ฮ“0(N).

Another of my pet follow-up projects is to determine whether or not the monster group M dictates the shape of the moonshine picture.

That is, can one recover the 97 number lattices and their partition in 7 families starting from the set of element orders of M, applying some set of simple rules?

One of these rules will follow from the two equivalent notations for lattices, and the two different sets of roots of unities centered at a given lattice. This will imply that if a number lattice belongs to a given family, certain divisors and multiples of it must belong to related families.

If this works out, it may be a first step towards a possibly new understanding of moonshine.

Published in groups math noncommutative