Last time we have that that one can represent (the conjugacy class of) a finite index subgroup of the modular group
For example, the modular group itself is represented by the Farey symbol
[tex]\xymatrix{\infty \ar@{-}[r]_{\circ} & 0 \ar@{-}[r]_{\bullet} & \infty}[/tex] or by its dessin (the green circle-edge) or by its fundamental domain which is the region of the upper halfplane bounded by the red and blue vertical boundaries. Both the red and blue boundary consist of TWO edges which are identified with each other and are therefore called a and b. These edges carry a natural orientation given by circling counter-clockwise along the boundary of the marked triangle (or clockwise along the boundary of the upper unmarked triangle having
[tex]\xymatrix{i \ar[rd]_a & & \rho \ar[ll]_c \ & 0 \ar[ru]_b}[/tex]
embedded in the 2-sphere. Note that quiver is just a fancy name for an oriented graph…
Okay, let’s look at the next case, that of the unique index 2 subgroup
That is we have 6 edges on the 2-sphere
[tex]\xymatrix{& i \ar@/^/[dd]^f \ar@/_/[dd]_e & \
\rho^2 \ar[ru]^d & & \rho \ar[lu]_c \
& 0 \ar[lu]^a \ar[ru]_b &}[/tex]
As a mental check, verify that the index 3 subgroup determined by the Farey symbol [tex]\xymatrix{\infty \ar@{-}[r]_{\circ} & 0 \ar@{-}[r]_{\circ} & 1 \ar@{-}[r]_{\circ} & \infty}[/tex] , whose fundamental domain with identifications is given on the left, has as its associated quiver picture
[tex]\xymatrix{& & \rho \ar[lld]_d \ar[ld]^f \ar[rd]^e & \
i \ar[rrd]_a & i+1 \ar[rd]^b & & \omega \ar[ld]^c \
& & 0 \ar[uu]^h \ar@/^/[uu]^g \ar@/_/[uu]_i &}[/tex]
whereas the index 3 subgroup determined by the Farey symbol [tex]\xymatrix{\infty \ar@{-}[r]_{1} & 0 \ar@{-}[r]_{1} & 1 \ar@{-}[r]_{\circ} & \infty}[/tex], whose fundamental domain with identifications is depicted on the right, has as its associated quiver
[tex]\xymatrix{i \ar[rr]^a \ar[dd]^b & & 1 \ar@/^/[ld]^h \ar@/_/[ld]_i \
& \rho \ar@/^/[lu]^d \ar@/_/[lu]_e \ar[rd]^f & \
0 \ar[ru]^g & & i+1 \ar[uu]^c}[/tex]
Next time, we will use these quivers to define superpotentials…
Comments