arxiv – Page 23 – neverendingbooks

double Poisson algebras

Published October 26, 2004 by lieven

This morning,
Michel Van den Bergh posted an interesting paper on the arXiv
entitled Double
Poisson Algebras. His main motivation was the construction of a
natural Poisson structure on quotient varieties of representations of
deformed multiplicative preprojective algebras (introduced by
Crawley-Boevey and Shaw in Multiplicative
preprojective algebras, middle convolution and the Deligne-Simpson
problem) which he achieves by extending his double Poisson structure
on the path algebra of the quiver to the 'obvious' universal
localization, that is the one by inverting all $1 + a a^{⋆}$ for $a$ an
arrow and $a^{⋆}$ its double (the one in the other direction).
For me the more interesting fact of this paper is that his double
bracket on the path algebra of a double quiver gives finer information
than the _necklace Lie algebra_ as defined in my (old) paper with Raf
Bocklandt Necklace
Lie algebras and noncommutative symplectic geometry. I will
certainly come back to this later when I have more energy but just to
wet your appetite let me point out that Michel calls a _double bracket_
on an algebra $A$ a bilinear map
${{-, -}} : A \times A \to A \otimes A$
which is a derivation in the _second_
argument (for the outer bimodulke structure on $A$ ) and satisfies
${{a, b}} = - {{b, a}}^{o}$ with $(u \otimes v)^{0} = v \otimes u$
Given such a double bracket one can define an ordinary
bracket (using standard Hopf-algebra notation)
${a, b} = \sum {{a, b}}_{(1)} {{a, b}}_{(2)}$
which makes $A$ into
a Loday
algebra and induces a Lie algebra structure on $A / [A, A]$ . He then
goes on to define such a double bracket on the path algebra of a double
quiver in such a way that the associated Lie structure above is the
necklace Lie algebra.

a cosmic Galois group

Published October 6, 2004 by lieven

Are
there hidden relations between mathematical and physical constants such
as

$\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ϵ_{0} h c} \sim \frac{1}{137}$

or are these numerical relations mere accidents? A couple of years
ago, Pierre Cartier proposed in his paper A mad day’s work : from Grothendieck to Connes and
Kontsevich : the evolution of concepts of space and symmetry that
there are many reasons to believe in a cosmic Galois group acting on the
fundamental constants of physical theories and responsible for relations
such as the one above.

The Euler-Zagier numbers are infinite
sums over $n_{1} > n_{2} >! > n_{r} \geq 1$ of the form

$ζ (k_{1}, \dots, k_{r}) = \sum n_{1}^{- k_{1}} \dots n_{r}^{- k_{r}}$

and there are polynomial relations with rational coefficients between
these such as the product relation

$ζ (a) ζ (b) = ζ (a + b) + ζ (a, b) + ζ (b, a)$

It is
conjectured that all polynomial relations among Euler-Zagier numbers are
consequences of these product relations and similar explicitly known
formulas. A consequence of this conjecture would be that
$ζ (3), ζ (5), \dots$ are all trancendental!

Drinfeld
introduced the Grothendieck-Teichmuller group-scheme over $Q$
whose Lie algebra ${grt}_{1}$ is conjectured to be the free Lie
algebra on infinitely many generators which correspond in a natural way
to the numbers $ζ (3), ζ (5), \dots$ . The Grothendieck-Teichmuller
group itself plays the role of the Galois group for the Euler-Zagier
numbers as it is conjectured to act by automorphisms on the graded
$Q$ -algebra whose degree $d$ -term are the linear combinations
of the numbers $ζ (k_{1}, \dots, k_{r})$ with rational coefficients and
such that $k_{1} + \dots + k_{r} = d$ .

The Grothendieck-Teichmuller
group also appears mysteriously in non-commutative geometry. For
example, the set of all Kontsevich deformation quantizations has a
symmetry group which Kontsevich conjectures to be isomorphic to the
Grothendieck-Teichmuller group. See section 4 of his paper Operads and motives in
deformation quantzation for more details.

It also appears
in the renormalization results of Alain Connes and Dirk Kreimer. A very
readable introduction to this is given by Alain Connes himself in Symmetries Galoisiennes
et renormalisation. Perhaps the latest news on Cartier’s dream of a
cosmic Galois group is the paper by Alain Connes and Matilde Marcolli posted
last month on the arXiv : Renormalization and
motivic Galois theory. A good web-page on all of this, including
references, can be found here.

cotangent bundles

Published September 9, 2004 by lieven

The
previous post in this sequence was [moduli spaces][1]. Why did we spend
time explaining the connection of the quiver
$Misplaced &$
to moduli spaces of vectorbundles on curves and moduli spaces of linear
control systems? At the start I said we would concentrate on its _double
quiver_ $Misplaced &$ Clearly,
this already gives away the answer : if the path algebra $C Q$
determines a (non-commutative) manifold $M$ , then the path algebra $C \tilde{Q}$ determines the cotangent bundle of $M$ . Recall that for a
commutative manifold $M$ , the cotangent bundle is the vectorbundle
having at the point $p \in M$ as fiber the linear dual $(T_{p} M)^{*}$ of
the tangent space. So, why do we claim that $C \tilde{Q}$
corresponds to the cotangent bundle of $C Q$ ? Fix a dimension vector
$α = (m, n)$ then the representation space
${rep}_{α} Q = M_{n \times m} (C) \oplus M_{n} (C)$ is just
an affine space so in its point the tangent space is the representation
space itself. To define its linear dual use the non-degeneracy of the
_trace pairings_ $M_{n \times m} (C) \times M_{m \times n} (C) \to C : (A, B) \mapsto t r (A B)$ $M_{n} (C) \times M_{n} (C) \to C : (C, D) \mapsto t r (C D)$ and therefore the linear dual
${rep}_{α} Q^{*} = M_{m \times n} (C) \oplus M_{n} (C)$ which is
the representation space ${rep}_{α} Q^{s}$ of the quiver
$Misplaced &$
and therefore we have that the cotangent bundle to the representation
space ${rep}_{α} Q$ $T^{*} {rep}_{α} Q = {rep}_{α} \tilde{Q}$ Important for us will be that any
cotangent bundle has a natural _symplectic structure_. For a good
introduction to this see the [course notes][2] “Symplectic geometry and
quivers” by [Geert Van de Weyer][3]. As a consequence $C \tilde{Q}$
can be viewed as a non-commutative symplectic manifold with the
symplectic structure determined by the non-commutative 2-form
$ω = d a^{*} d a + d x^{*} d x$ but before we can define all this we
will have to recall some facts on non-commutative differential forms.
Maybe [next time][4]. For the impatient : have a look at the paper by
Victor Ginzburg [Non-commutative Symplectic Geometry, Quiver varieties,
and Operads][5] or my paper with Raf Bocklandt [Necklace Lie algebras
and noncommutative symplectic geometry][6]. Now that we have a
cotangent bundle of $C Q$ is there also a _tangent bundle_ and does it
again correspond to a new quiver? Well yes, here it is
$Misplaced &$ and the labeling of the
arrows may help you to work through some sections of the Cuntz-Quillen
paper…

[1]: https://lievenlb.local/index.php?p=39
[2]: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~gvdwey/lectures/symplectic_moment.pdf
[3]: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~gvdwey/
[4]: https://lievenlb.local/index.php?p=41
[5]: http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math.QA/0005165
[6]: http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math.AG/0010030

Tag: arxiv

double Poisson algebras

a cosmic Galois group

cotangent bundles