Skip to content โ†’

neverendingbooks Posts

smooth Brauer-Severis

Around the
same time Michel Van den Bergh introduced his Brauer-Severi schemes,
[Claudio Procesi][1] (extending earlier work of [Bill Schelter][2])
introduced smooth orders as those orders A in a central simple algebra
ฮฃ (of dimension n2) such that their representation variety
trepn A is a smooth variety. Many interesting orders are smooth
: hereditary orders, trace rings of generic matrices and more generally
size n approximations of formally smooth algebras (that is,
non-commutative manifolds). As in the commutative case, every order has
a Zariski open subset where it is a smooth order. The relevance of
this notion to the study of Brauer-Severi varieties is that XA is a
smooth variety whenever A is a smooth order. Indeed, the Brauer-Severi
scheme was the orbit space of the principal GLn-fibration on the
Brauer-stable representations (see [last time][3]) which form a Zariski
open subset of the smooth variety trepn Aร—kn. In fact,
in most cases the reverse implication will also hold, that is, if XA
is smooth then usually A is a smooth order. However, for low n,
there are some counterexamples. Consider the so called quantum plane
Aq=kq[x,y] : yx=qxy with  q an n-th root of unity then one
can easily prove (using the fact that the smooth order locus of Aq is
everything but the origin in the central variety  A2) that
the singularities of the Brauer-Severi scheme XA are the orbits
corresponding to those nilpotent representations  ฯ•:Aโ†’Mn(k) which are at the same time singular points in trepn A
and have a cyclic vector. As there are singular points among the
nilpotent representations, the Brauer-Severi scheme will also be
singular except perhaps for small values of n. For example, if
 n=2 the defining relation is  xy+yx=0 and any trace preserving
representation has a matrix-description  xโ†’[abcโˆ’a] yโ†’[defโˆ’d] such that
 2ad+bf+ec=0. That is,  trep2 A=V(2ad+bf+ec)โŠ‚A6 which is an hypersurface with a unique
singular point (the origin). As this point corresponds to the
zero-representation (which does not have a cyclic vector) the
Brauer-Severi scheme will be smooth in this case. [Colin
Ingalls][4] extended this calculation to show that the Brauer-Severi
scheme is equally smooth when  n=3 but has a unique (!) singular point
when  n=4. So probably all Brauer-Severi schemes for nโ‰ฅ4 are
indeed singular. I conjecture that this is a general feature for
Brauer-Severi schemes of families (depending on the p.i.-degree n) of
non-smooth orders.

[1]: http://venere.mat.uniroma1.it/people/procesi/
[2]: http://www.fact-index.com/b/bi/bill_schelter.html
[3]: https://lievenlb.local/index.php?p=341
[4]: http://kappa.math.unb.ca/~colin/

Leave a Comment

Brauer-Severi varieties

![][1]
Classical Brauer-Severi varieties can be described either as twisted
forms of projective space (Severi\โ€™s way) or as varieties containing
splitting information about central simple algebras (Brauer\โ€™s way). If
K is a field with separable closure Kโ€•, the first approach
asks for projective varieties X defined over K such that over the
separable closure X(Kโ€•)โ‰ƒPKโ€•nโˆ’1 they are just projective space. In
the second approach let ฮฃ be a central simple K-algebra and
define a variety Xฮฃ whose points over a field extension L
are precisely the left ideals of ฮฃโŠ—KL of dimension n.
This variety is defined over K and is a closed subvariety of the
Grassmannian Gr(n,n2). In the special case that ฮฃ=Mn(K) one
can use the matrix-idempotents to show that the left ideals of dimension
n correspond to the points of PKnโˆ’1. As for any central
simple K-algebra ฮฃ we have that ฮฃโŠ—KKโ€•โ‰ƒMn(Kโ€•) it follows that the varieties Xฮฃ are
among those of the first approach. In fact, there is a natural bijection
between those of the first approach (twisted forms) and of the second as
both are classified by the Galois cohomology pointed set
H1(Gal(Kโ€•/K),PGLn(Kโ€•)) because
PGLn(Kโ€•) is the automorphism group of
PKโ€•nโˆ’1 as well as of Mn(Kโ€•). The
ringtheoretic relevance of the Brauer-Severi variety Xฮฃ is
that for any field extension L it has L-rational points if and only
if L is a _splitting field_ for ฮฃ, that is, ฮฃโŠ—KLโ‰ƒMn(ฮฃ). To give one concrete example, If ฮฃ is the
quaternion-algebra (a,b)K, then the Brauer-Severi variety is a conic
Xฮฃ=V(x02โˆ’ax12โˆ’bx22)โŠ‚PK2
Whenever one has something working for central simple algebras, one can
_sheafify_ the construction to Azumaya algebras. For if A is an
Azumaya algebra with center R then for every maximal ideal
m of R, the quotient A/mA is a central
simple R/m-algebra. This was noted by the
sheafification-guru [Alexander Grothendieck][2] and he extended the
notion to Brauer-Severi schemes of Azumaya algebras which are projective
bundles XAโ†’max R all of which fibers are
projective spaces (in case R is an affine algebra over an
algebraically closed field). But the real fun started when [Mike
Artin][3] and [David Mumford][4] extended the construction to suitably
_ramified_ algebras. In good cases one has that the Brauer-Severi
fibration is flat with fibers over ramified points certain degenerations
of projective space. For example in the case considered by Artin and
Mumford of suitably ramified orders in quaternion algebras, the smooth
conics over Azumaya points degenerate to a pair of lines over ramified
points. A major application of their construction were examples of
unirational non-rational varieties. To date still one of the nicest
applications of non-commutative algebra to more mainstream mathematics.
The final step in generalizing Brauer-Severi fibrations to arbitrary
orders was achieved by [Michel Van den Bergh][5] in 1986. Let R be an
affine algebra over an algebraically closed field (say of characteristic
zero) k and let A be an R-order is a central simple algebra
ฮฃ of dimension n2. Let trepn A be teh affine variety
of _trace preserving_ n-dimensional representations, then there is a
natural action of GLn on this variety by basechange (conjugation).
Moreover, GLn acts by left multiplication on column vectors kn.
One then considers the open subset in trepn Aร—kn
consisting of _Brauer-Stable representations_, that is those pairs
(ฯ•,v) such that ฯ•(A).v=kn on which GLn acts freely. The
corresponding orbit space is then called the Brauer-Severio scheme XA
of A and there is a fibration XAโ†’max R again
having as fibers projective spaces over Azumaya points but this time the
fibration is allowed to be far from flat in general. Two months ago I
outlined in Warwick an idea to apply this Brauer-Severi scheme to get a
hold on desingularizations of quiver quotient singularities. More on
this next time.

[1]: https://lievenlb.local/DATA/brauer.jpg
[2]: http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Grothendieck.html
[3]: http://www.cirs-tm.org/researchers/researchers.php?id=235
[4]: http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Mumford.html
[5]: http://alpha.luc.ac.be/Research/Algebra/Members/michel_id.html

Leave a Comment

irrelevant list

As
there is no way to recover from the previous post, allow me a slow
restart by listing some of the a-typical things done this week :

  • Ate more chocolate than during the last five years

  • Drove the car more than during the rest of the year (minus
    vacations)

  • Didn't do any bicycle exercise

  • Only checked email in the morning (at best)

  • Didn't do any math (apart from helping
    PseudonymousDaughter2)

  • Didn't go in to university at
    all

  • Drank even more coffee than usual

  • Regardless, felt exhausted every evening

  • Did far
    less web-surfing (but managed to find
    this
    on academic blogging)

  • Cooked fast and way too
    cholestorol-rich meals

  • Ate even more chocolates
    โ€ฆ

Fortunately, the semester (and teaching)
starts tomorrow!

Leave a Comment