Today, Samuel Dehority, Xavier Gonzalez, Neekon Vafa and Roger Van Peski arXived their paper Moonshine for all finite groups.
Originally, Moonshine was thought to be connected to the Monster group. McKay and Thompson observed that the first coefficients of the normalized elliptic modular invariant
could be written as sums of dimensions of the first few irreducible representations of the monster group:
Soon it transpired that there ought to be an infinite dimensional graded vectorspace, the moonshine module
with every component
It only got better, for any conjugacy class
you get a function invariant under the action of the subgroup
acting via transformations
Soon, further instances of ‘moonshine’ were discovered for other simple groups, the unifying feature being that one associates to a group
Today, this group of people proved that there is ‘moonshine’ for any finite group whatsoever.
They changed the definition of moonshine slightly to introduce the notion of moonshine of depth
as they are interested in the asymptotic behaviour of the components
What baffled me was their much weaker observation (remark 2) saying that you get ‘moonshine’ in the form described above, that is, a graded representation
And, more importantly, you can explain this to any student taking a first course in group theory as all you need is Cayley’s theorem stating that any finite group is a subgroup of some symmetric group
Here’s the idea: take the original monster-moonshine module
with the natural action of
Now, embed a la Cayley
which is invariant under
For example, for
Clearly, the main results of the paper are much more subtle, but I’m already happy with this version of ‘moonshine for everyone’!