Skip to content →

differential forms

The
previous post in this sequence was [(co)tangent bundles][1]. Let A be
a V-algebra where V=C××C is the subalgebra
generated by a complete set of orthogonal idempotents in A (in case A=CQ is a path algebra, V will be the subalgebra generated by the
vertex-idempotents, see the post on [path algebras][2] for more
details). With A we denote the bimodule quotient
A=A/V Then, we can define the _non-commutative
(relative) differential n-forms_ to be ΩVn A=AVAVVA with n factors
A. To get the connection with usual differential forms let
us denote the tensor a0a1an=(a0,a1,,an)=a0da1dan On ΩV A=n ΩVn A one defines an algebra structure via the
multiplication (a0da1dan)(an+1dan+2dak)=i=1n(1)nia0da1d(aiai+1)dak
ΩV A is a _differential graded algebra_ with differential d:ΩVn AΩVn+1 A defined by d(a0da1dan)=da0da1dan This may seem fairly abstract but in
case A=CQ is a path algebra, then the bimodule ΩVn A has a
V-generating set consisting of precisely the elements p0dp1dpn with all pi non-zero paths in A and such that
p0p1pn is also a non-zero path. One can put another
algebra multiplication on ΩV A which Cuntz and Quillen call the
_Fedosov product_ defined for an n-form ω and a form μ by
ωCircμ=ωμ(1)ndωdμ There is an
important relation between the two structures, the degree of a
differential form puts a filtration on ΩV A (with Fedosov
product) such that the _associated graded algebra_ is ΩV A with
the usual product. One can visualize the Fedosov product easily in the
case of path algebras because ΩV CQ with the Fedosov product is
again the path algebra of the quiver obtained by doubling up all the
arrows of Q. In our basic example when Q is the quiver
Misplaced & the
algebra of non-commutative differential forms equipped with the Fedosov
product is isomorphic to the path algebra of the quiver
Misplaced & with the
indicated identification of arrows with elements from ΩV CQ.
Note however that we usually embed the algebra CQ as the degree zero
differential forms in ΩV CQ with the usual multiplication and
that this embedding is no longer an algebra map (but a based linear map)
for the Fedosov product. For this reason, Cuntz and Quillen invent a
Yang-Mills type argument to “flow” this linear map to an algebra
embedding, but to motivate this we will have to say some things about
[curvatures][3].

[1]: https://lievenlb.local/index.php?p=352
[2]: https://lievenlb.local/index.php?p=349
[3]: https://lievenlb.local/index.php?p=353

Published in featured

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *